A fresh controversy has emerged in Pakistan’s judicial system as proposed transfers of judges from the Islamabad High Court have triggered widespread debate over judicial independence and administrative authority. The development involves potential relocation of five judges to different high courts, with plans to assign them to regional benches instead of principal seats.
Among the key names, Justice Mohsin Akhtar Kayani is reportedly being considered for transfer to the Lahore High Court, possibly to its Multan or Bahawalpur bench. Similarly, Justice Babar Sattar may be moved to the Peshawar High Court and posted at the Bannu bench. Other judges under consideration include Justice Arbab Muhammad Tahir for the Balochistan High Court, along with Justice Saman Rafat Imtiaz and Justice Khadim Hussain Soomro for the Sindh High Court.
The proposal, initiated by Islamabad High Court Chief Justice Sardar Sarfraz Dogar, has raised serious concerns within legal circles. Experts argue that assigning senior judges to regional benches instead of central courts could impact judicial functioning and set a controversial precedent.
Chief Justice of Pakistan Yahya Afridi has reportedly expressed reservations, warning that such decisions could undermine judicial independence. The matter is now expected to be reviewed by the Judicial Commission of Pakistan, where divisions among members suggest that not all transfers may be approved.
This ongoing debate highlights deeper institutional concerns regarding transparency, governance, and the balance of power within Pakistan’s judiciary. The outcome of the commission’s decision could significantly influence public trust and the future direction of judicial administration in the country.
